You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding the implementation of Direct Health Facility Financing and its effect on health system performance in Tanzania: a non-controlled before and after mixed method study protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-018-0400-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ntuli A. Kapologwe, Albino Kalolo, Stephen M. Kibusi, Zainab Chaula, Anna Nswilla, Thomas Teuscher, Kyaw Aung, Josephine Borghi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 3 | 18% |
| Egypt | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Uganda | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 385 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 385 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 76 | 20% |
| Researcher | 29 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 65 | 17% |
| Unknown | 148 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 52 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 54 | 14% |
| Unknown | 154 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,436,234
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#137
of 1,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,852
of 448,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#7
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.