↓ Skip to main content

Understanding professional advice networks in long-term care: an outside-inside view of best practice pathways for diffusion

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding professional advice networks in long-term care: an outside-inside view of best practice pathways for diffusion
Published in
Implementation Science, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13012-019-0858-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa A. Cranley, Janice M. Keefe, Deanne Taylor, Genevieve Thompson, Amanda M. Beacom, Janet E. Squires, Carole A. Estabrooks, James W. Dearing, Peter G. Norton, Whitney B. Berta

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Professor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 11 24%
Unknown 13 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 9%
Engineering 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 14 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,796,080
of 14,553,216 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#532
of 1,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,280
of 326,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,553,216 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them