You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fornix white matter glia damage causes hippocampal gray matter damage during age-dependent limbic decline
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-018-37658-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claudia Metzler-Baddeley, Jilu P. Mole, Rebecca Sims, Fabrizio Fasano, John Evans, Derek K. Jones, John P. Aggleton, Roland J. Baddeley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 21% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 11 | 18% |
| Psychology | 6 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2019.
All research outputs
#878,387
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#9,272
of 125,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,822
of 437,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#314
of 3,642 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,642 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.