↓ Skip to main content

Fornix white matter glia damage causes hippocampal gray matter damage during age-dependent limbic decline

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Fornix white matter glia damage causes hippocampal gray matter damage during age-dependent limbic decline
Published in
Scientific Reports, January 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-37658-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Metzler-Baddeley, Jilu P. Mole, Rebecca Sims, Fabrizio Fasano, John Evans, Derek K. Jones, John P. Aggleton, Roland J. Baddeley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 33%
Unspecified 5 28%
Professor 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 8 44%
Neuroscience 4 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Psychology 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 2 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2019.
All research outputs
#416,879
of 13,361,190 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#4,767
of 64,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,803
of 285,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,361,190 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them