↓ Skip to main content

A Comparative Analysis of Collaborative Environmental Management of Natural Resources in Sub-Saharan Africa: A study of Cameroon and South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Asian & African Studies, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 203)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Comparative Analysis of Collaborative Environmental Management of Natural Resources in Sub-Saharan Africa: A study of Cameroon and South Africa
Published in
Journal of Asian & African Studies, January 2019
DOI 10.1177/0021909618825276
Authors

Regis Musavengane, Henry Bikwibili Tantoh, Danny Simatele

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,044,364
of 12,498,829 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Asian & African Studies
#33
of 203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,576
of 150,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Asian & African Studies
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,498,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 203 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them