↓ Skip to main content

Britain’s armed forces and amphibious operations in peace and war 1919–1939: A Gallipoli Curse?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Strategic Studies, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Britain’s armed forces and amphibious operations in peace and war 1919–1939: A Gallipoli Curse?
Published in
Journal of Strategic Studies, January 2019
DOI 10.1080/01402390.2019.1570145
Authors

Matthew Heaslip

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,613,827
of 13,216,354 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Strategic Studies
#118
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,316
of 279,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Strategic Studies
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,216,354 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.