↓ Skip to main content

雑草管理者のための雑草の識別と調査の基礎

Overview of attention for article published in Weeds and Vegetation Management, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
雑草管理者のための雑草の識別と調査の基礎
Published in
Weeds and Vegetation Management, February 2019
DOI 10.24463/iuws.10.0_16
Authors

浅井 元朗

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2019.
All research outputs
#6,551,539
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Weeds and Vegetation Management
#2
of 15 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,120
of 447,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Weeds and Vegetation Management
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one scored the same or higher as 13 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.