↓ Skip to main content

Consequences of Routine Work-Schedule Instability for Worker Health and Well-Being

Overview of attention for article published in American Sociological Review, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 1,954)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
41 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
311 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
257 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
356 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consequences of Routine Work-Schedule Instability for Worker Health and Well-Being
Published in
American Sociological Review, February 2019
DOI 10.1177/0003122418823184
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Schneider, Kristen Harknett

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 311 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 356 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 356 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 20%
Student > Master 31 9%
Researcher 30 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 6%
Student > Bachelor 21 6%
Other 49 14%
Unknown 132 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 93 26%
Business, Management and Accounting 33 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 17 5%
Psychology 16 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 3%
Other 39 11%
Unknown 149 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 572. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#42,021
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from American Sociological Review
#15
of 1,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#830
of 449,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Sociological Review
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.