↓ Skip to main content

Needle aspiration versus intercostal tube drainage for pneumothorax in the newborn

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Needle aspiration versus intercostal tube drainage for pneumothorax in the newborn
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011724.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matteo Bruschettini, Olga Romantsik, Simona Zappettini, Colm PF O'Donnell, Maria Grazia Calevo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 14 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,369,739
of 14,731,479 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,790
of 11,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,938
of 327,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,731,479 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.