↓ Skip to main content

Neurodegeneration and the Intersubjectivities of Care

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Anthropology, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 424)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Neurodegeneration and the Intersubjectivities of Care
Published in
Medical Anthropology, February 2019
DOI 10.1080/01459740.2019.1570189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Narelle Warren, Dikaios Sakellariou

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 75%
Psychology 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2019.
All research outputs
#827,271
of 13,709,710 outputs
Outputs from Medical Anthropology
#27
of 424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,950
of 300,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Anthropology
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,709,710 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.