↓ Skip to main content

Advance care planning for cancer patients in primary care: a feasibility study

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advance care planning for cancer patients in primary care: a feasibility study
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, December 2010
DOI 10.3399/bjgp10x544032
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kirsty Boyd, Bruce Mason, Marilyn Kendall, Stephen Barclay, David Chinn, Keri Thomas, Aziz Sheikh, Scott A Murray

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 146 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 16%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Other 12 8%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 17 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 25%
Social Sciences 14 9%
Psychology 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 20 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#5,607,547
of 17,358,590 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,944
of 3,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,933
of 350,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#49
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,358,590 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.