You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Advance care planning for cancer patients in primary care: a feasibility study
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, December 2010
|
DOI | 10.3399/bjgp10x544032 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kirsty Boyd, Bruce Mason, Marilyn Kendall, Stephen Barclay, David Chinn, Keri Thomas, Aziz Sheikh, Scott A Murray |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 172 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 37 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 13% |
Researcher | 18 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
Other | 14 | 8% |
Other | 34 | 20% |
Unknown | 33 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 23% |
Social Sciences | 15 | 9% |
Psychology | 9 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Other | 15 | 9% |
Unknown | 34 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,472,947
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,405
of 4,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,154
of 180,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#18
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.