↓ Skip to main content

Facetiming common worlds: exchanging digital place stories and crafting pedagogical contact zones

Overview of attention for article published in Children's Geographies, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 264)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
36 tweeters
Title
Facetiming common worlds: exchanging digital place stories and crafting pedagogical contact zones
Published in
Children's Geographies, February 2019
DOI 10.1080/14733285.2019.1574339
Authors

Nicole Land, Catherine Hamm, Sherri-Lynn Yazbeck, Ildikó Danis, Miriam Brown, Narda Nelson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2019.
All research outputs
#495,304
of 12,533,317 outputs
Outputs from Children's Geographies
#16
of 264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,733
of 162,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Children's Geographies
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,533,317 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.