↓ Skip to main content

Why You Should Always Include a Random Slope for the Lower-Level Variable Involved in a Cross-Level Interaction

Overview of attention for article published in European Sociological Review, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
76 X users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
294 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
295 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why You Should Always Include a Random Slope for the Lower-Level Variable Involved in a Cross-Level Interaction
Published in
European Sociological Review, February 2019
DOI 10.1093/esr/jcy053
Authors

Jan Paul Heisig, Merlin Schaeffer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 295 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 25%
Student > Master 43 15%
Researcher 41 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 6%
Student > Bachelor 19 6%
Other 43 15%
Unknown 55 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 112 38%
Psychology 44 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 2%
Other 41 14%
Unknown 75 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2023.
All research outputs
#855,619
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from European Sociological Review
#64
of 1,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,111
of 449,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Sociological Review
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.