↓ Skip to main content

Evidence on global medical travel

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence on global medical travel
Published in
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, September 2015
DOI 10.2471/blt.14.146027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kai Ruggeri, Ladislav Záliš, Christopher R Meurice, Ian Hilton, Terry-Lisa Ly, Zorana Zupan, Saba Hinrichs

Abstract

The potential benefits of travelling across national borders to obtain medical treatment include improved care, decreased costs and reduced waiting times. However, medical travel involves additional risks, compared to obtaining treatment domestically. We review the publicly-available evidence on medical travel. We suggest that medical travel needs to be understood in terms of its potential risks and benefits so that it can be evaluated against alternatives by patients who are seeking care. We propose three domains -quality standards, informed decision-making, economic and legal protection - in which better evidence could support the development of medical travel policies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 97 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 23 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 14%
Social Sciences 13 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Psychology 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 31 31%