You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Immunotherapy of triple-negative breast cancer with cathepsin D-targeting antibodies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40425-019-0498-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yahya Ashraf, Hanane Mansouri, Valérie Laurent-Matha, Lindsay B. Alcaraz, Pascal Roger, Séverine Guiu, Danielle Derocq, Gautier Robin, Henri-Alexandre Michaud, Helène Delpech, Marta Jarlier, Martine Pugnière, Bruno Robert, Anthony Puel, Lucie Martin, Flavie Landomiel, Thomas Bourquard, Oussama Achour, Ingrid Fruitier-Arnaudin, Alexandre Pichard, Emmanuel Deshayes, Andrei Turtoi, Anne Poupon, Joëlle Simony-Lafontaine, Florence Boissière-Michot, Nelly Pirot, Florence Bernex, William Jacot, Stanislas du Manoir, Charles Theillet, Jean-Pierre Pouget, Isabelle Navarro-Teulon, Nathalie Bonnefoy, André Pèlegrin, Thierry Chardès, Pierre Martineau, Emmanuelle Liaudet-Coopman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 39 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 46 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,932,988
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#1,652
of 3,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,827
of 446,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#54
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.