↓ Skip to main content

Tilting at windmills: The flawed U.S. policy toward the 1971 Indo-Pakistani war

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Strategic Studies, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 411)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
49 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor
Title
Tilting at windmills: The flawed U.S. policy toward the 1971 Indo-Pakistani war
Published in
Journal of Strategic Studies, February 2019
DOI 10.1080/01402390.2019.1570143
Authors

Christopher Clary

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2019.
All research outputs
#423,352
of 13,223,748 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Strategic Studies
#26
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,171
of 279,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Strategic Studies
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,223,748 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.