↓ Skip to main content

What we can (and can’t) infer about implicit bias from debiasing experiments

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What we can (and can’t) infer about implicit bias from debiasing experiments
Published in
Synthese, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11229-019-02128-6
Authors

Nick Byrd

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 22%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Master 4 13%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 8 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 5 16%
Social Sciences 5 16%
Psychology 3 9%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 9 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2023.
All research outputs
#6,636,614
of 23,864,146 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#666
of 2,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,502
of 451,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#15
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,864,146 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.