↓ Skip to main content

Current use of vasopressors in septic shock

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
31 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
329 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current use of vasopressors in septic shock
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13613-019-0498-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas W. L. Scheeren, Jan Bakker, Daniel De Backer, Djillali Annane, Pierre Asfar, E. Christiaan Boerma, Maurizio Cecconi, Arnaldo Dubin, Martin W. Dünser, Jacques Duranteau, Anthony C. Gordon, Olfa Hamzaoui, Glenn Hernández, Marc Leone, Bruno Levy, Claude Martin, Alexandre Mebazaa, Xavier Monnet, Andrea Morelli, Didier Payen, Rupert Pearse, Michael R. Pinsky, Peter Radermacher, Daniel Reuter, Bernd Saugel, Yasser Sakr, Mervyn Singer, Pierre Squara, Antoine Vieillard-Baron, Philippe Vignon, Simon T. Vistisen, Iwan C. C. van der Horst, Jean-Louis Vincent, Jean-Louis Teboul

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 329 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 49 15%
Student > Bachelor 34 10%
Student > Postgraduate 33 10%
Student > Master 27 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 6%
Other 71 22%
Unknown 94 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 152 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Engineering 6 2%
Other 30 9%
Unknown 102 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,825,502
of 25,882,826 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#219
of 1,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,178
of 449,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#7
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,882,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.