↓ Skip to main content

Explaining harvests of wild-harvested herbaceous plants: American ginseng as a case study

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Explaining harvests of wild-harvested herbaceous plants: American ginseng as a case study
Published in
Biological Conservation, March 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.006
Authors

John Paul Schmidt, Jennifer Cruse-Sanders, James L. Chamberlain, Susana Ferreira, John A. Young

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 29%
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Unspecified 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 29%
Unspecified 2 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2019.
All research outputs
#3,387,037
of 13,127,591 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,905
of 3,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,368
of 275,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#39
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,127,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,862 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.