↓ Skip to main content

Response to “Prepublication Communication of Research Results”: The Need for a Coordinated Wildlife Disease Surveillance Laboratory Network

Overview of attention for article published in EcoHealth, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Response to “Prepublication Communication of Research Results”: The Need for a Coordinated Wildlife Disease Surveillance Laboratory Network
Published in
EcoHealth, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10393-019-01396-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan M. Sleeman, David S. Blehert, Katherine L. D. Richgels, C. LeAnn White

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2019.
All research outputs
#10,092,941
of 12,617,751 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#413
of 492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,396
of 203,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,617,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.