You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multi‐scale habitat selection of elk in response to beetle‐killed forest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wildlife Management, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/jwmg.21631 |
| Authors |
Bryan G. Lamont, Kevin L. Monteith, Jerod A. Merkle, Tony W. Mong, Shannon E. Albeke, Matthew M. Hayes, Matthew J. Kauffman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 24 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2019.
All research outputs
#717,891
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#72
of 2,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,669
of 437,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,351 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.