↓ Skip to main content

Mal Olor and Colonial Latin American History: Smellscapes in Lima, Peru, 1535–1614

Overview of attention for article published in Hispanic American Historical Review, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 235)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mal Olor and Colonial Latin American History: Smellscapes in Lima, Peru, 1535–1614
Published in
Hispanic American Historical Review, February 2019
DOI 10.1215/00182168-7287951
Authors

Kathleen Kole de Peralta

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2019.
All research outputs
#757,908
of 12,519,100 outputs
Outputs from Hispanic American Historical Review
#3
of 235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,194
of 154,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hispanic American Historical Review
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,519,100 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 235 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them