You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Subacromial decompression surgery for adults with shoulder pain: a clinical practice guideline
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.l294 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Per Olav Vandvik, Tuomas Lähdeoja, Clare Ardern, Rachelle Buchbinder, Jaydeep Moro, Jens Ivar Brox, Jako Burgers, Qiukui Hao, Teemu Karjalainen, Michel van den Bekerom, Julia Noorduyn, Lyubov Lytvyn, Reed A C Siemieniuk, Alexandra Albin, Sean Chua Shunjie, Florian Fisch, Laurie Proulx, Gordon Guyatt, Thomas Agoritsas, Rudolf W Poolman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 590 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 91 | 15% |
| United States | 44 | 7% |
| Saudi Arabia | 31 | 5% |
| Canada | 30 | 5% |
| Australia | 29 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 22 | 4% |
| Spain | 21 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 11 | 2% |
| Norway | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 80 | 14% |
| Unknown | 221 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 417 | 71% |
| Scientists | 90 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 75 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 225 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 11% |
| Other | 22 | 10% |
| Researcher | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 47 | 21% |
| Unknown | 72 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 20% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 81 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 528. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2023.
All research outputs
#48,121
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#921
of 64,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#960
of 448,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#18
of 793 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 793 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.