↓ Skip to main content

Lithic raw material acquisition and use by early Homo sapiens at Skhul, Israel

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Human Evolution, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lithic raw material acquisition and use by early Homo sapiens at Skhul, Israel
Published in
Journal of Human Evolution, February 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.10.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ravid Ekshtain, Christian A. Tryon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,665,267
of 12,535,227 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Human Evolution
#703
of 1,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,017
of 160,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Human Evolution
#22
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,535,227 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.