↓ Skip to main content

Safe use of systemic bevacizumab for respiratory recurrent papillomatosis in two children

Overview of attention for article published in The Laryngoscope, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safe use of systemic bevacizumab for respiratory recurrent papillomatosis in two children
Published in
The Laryngoscope, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/lary.27674
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudio Carnevale, Luis Ferrán‐De la Cierva, Guillermo Til‐Pérez, José Antonio Peña‐Zarza, Borja Osona‐Rodriguez, Joaquina Martinez‐Lozano, Pedro Sarría‐Echegaray, Diego Arancibia‐Tagle, Manuel Tomás‐Barberán

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 13 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 17 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2019.
All research outputs
#14,165,857
of 23,848,132 outputs
Outputs from The Laryngoscope
#2,908
of 6,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,068
of 442,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Laryngoscope
#45
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,848,132 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.