↓ Skip to main content

Haemoglobin and haematocrit targets for the anaemia of chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Haemoglobin and haematocrit targets for the anaemia of chronic kidney disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003967.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanni FM Strippoli, Sankar D Navaneethan, Jonathan C Craig, Suetonia C Palmer

Abstract

Anaemia affects 60% to 80% of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) reduces quality of life and is a risk factor for early death. Treatment options are blood transfusion, erythropoietin (EPO) and darbepoetin alfa. Recently higher haemoglobin (Hb) and haematocrit (HCT) targets have been widely advocated because of positive associations with improved survival and quality of life from observational studies.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 2%
Italy 1 1%
Brunei Darussalam 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 86 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 21 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2015.
All research outputs
#1,235,482
of 12,406,407 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,138
of 8,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,785
of 223,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#167
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,406,407 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.