You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Barriers and facilitators to implementing dementia care mapping in care homes: results from the DCM™ EPIC trial process evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12877-019-1045-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alys W. Griffiths, Rachael Kelley, Lucy Garrod, Devon Perfect, Olivia Robinson, Emily Shoesmith, Joanne McDermid, Natasha Burnley, Claire A. Surr |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 57% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 52% |
| Scientists | 7 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 168 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 27 | 16% |
| Researcher | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 18% |
| Unknown | 55 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 27 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 10% |
| Psychology | 11 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Unknown | 62 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,515,475
of 24,149,630 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#287
of 3,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,477
of 447,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#10
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,149,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.