↓ Skip to main content

Population connectivity of pelagic megafauna in the Cuba-Mexico-United States triangle

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Population connectivity of pelagic megafauna in the Cuba-Mexico-United States triangle
Published in
Scientific Reports, February 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-38144-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jay R. Rooker, Michael A. Dance, R. J. David Wells, Matthew J. Ajemian, Barbara A. Block, Michael R. Castleton, J. Marcus Drymon, Brett J. Falterman, James S. Franks, Neil Hammerschlag, Jill M. Hendon, Eric R. Hoffmayer, Richard T. Kraus, Jennifer A. McKinney, David H. Secor, Gregory W. Stunz, John F. Walter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 44%
Researcher 3 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 44%
Environmental Science 4 44%
Unspecified 1 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2019.
All research outputs
#491,921
of 12,600,310 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#5,247
of 58,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,439
of 194,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,600,310 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,365 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.