You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding Effectiveness in its Broader Context: Assessing Case Study Methodologies for Evaluating Collaborative Conservation Governance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Society & Natural Resources, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1080/08941920.2018.1556761 |
| Authors |
Sarah Clement, Angela Guerrero Gonzalez, Carina Wyborn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 12% |
| United States | 3 | 12% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 48% |
| Scientists | 11 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 39 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 17 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 44 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,122,786
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Society & Natural Resources
#83
of 1,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,073
of 448,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Society & Natural Resources
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.