You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Integration of social and ecological sciences for natural resource decision making: challenges and opportunities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Management, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00267-019-01141-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kelly F. Robinson, Angela K. Fuller, Richard C. Stedman, William F. Siemer, Daniel J. Decker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 14% |
| Canada | 3 | 10% |
| Australia | 2 | 7% |
| France | 2 | 7% |
| Portugal | 2 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 16 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 12 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 18% |
| Researcher | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 30 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,158,701
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#131
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,339
of 452,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.