↓ Skip to main content

Integration of social and ecological sciences for natural resource decision making: challenges and opportunities

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integration of social and ecological sciences for natural resource decision making: challenges and opportunities
Published in
Environmental Management, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00267-019-01141-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly F. Robinson, Angela K. Fuller, Richard C. Stedman, William F. Siemer, Daniel J. Decker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 26%
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Other 4 7%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 18 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 23%
Social Sciences 6 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 5%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 10 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,140,692
of 16,293,248 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#65
of 1,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,929
of 343,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,293,248 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.