You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
子宮頸がんワクチン接種後の副反応:
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of The Showa University Society, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.14930/jshowaunivsoc.78.303 |
Authors |
池田 修一 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 12 | 34% |
Austria | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 22 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 34 | 97% |
Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,837,425
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from Journal of The Showa University Society
#3
of 117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,524
of 448,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of The Showa University Society
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them