↓ Skip to main content

Applying additive modelling and gradient boosting to assess the effects of watershed and reach characteristics on riverine assemblages

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Applying additive modelling and gradient boosting to assess the effects of watershed and reach characteristics on riverine assemblages
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, June 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00124.x
Authors

Kelly O. Maloney, Matthias Schmid, Donald E. Weller

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Slovenia 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 112 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 20%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 20 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 34%
Environmental Science 33 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 5%
Computer Science 5 4%
Engineering 5 4%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 26 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#2,080
of 2,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,347
of 122,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.