↓ Skip to main content

Applying additive modelling and gradient boosting to assess the effects of watershed and reach characteristics on riverine assemblages

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Applying additive modelling and gradient boosting to assess the effects of watershed and reach characteristics on riverine assemblages
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, February 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00124.x
Authors

Kelly O. Maloney, Matthias Schmid, Donald E. Weller, Maloney, Kelly O., Schmid, Matthias, Weller, Donald E.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Slovenia 2 3%
United States 2 3%
Spain 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Romania 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 51 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 21%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Unspecified 4 6%
Other 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 49%
Environmental Science 21 33%
Unspecified 8 13%
Computer Science 2 3%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#1,718,933
of 7,228,318 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#712
of 894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,211
of 321,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#40
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,228,318 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 63rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.