You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Whitening toothpaste containing activated charcoal, blue covarine, hydrogen peroxide or microbeads: which one is the most effective?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Applied Oral Science, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0051 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Vanessa Torraca Peraro Vaz, Dandara Proba Jubilato, Morgana Regina Mendonça de Oliveira, Janaina Freitas Bortolatto, Michael Christopher Floros, Andrea Abi Rached Dantas, Osmir Batista de Oliveira JUNIOR |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 8% |
Indonesia | 1 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Canada | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 256 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 55 | 21% |
Student > Master | 28 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 5% |
Researcher | 13 | 5% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 4% |
Other | 28 | 11% |
Unknown | 108 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 104 | 41% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 4% |
Chemistry | 6 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
Other | 14 | 5% |
Unknown | 113 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2023.
All research outputs
#553,478
of 24,875,365 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#5
of 575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,766
of 448,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,875,365 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 575 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.