You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clothianidin seed-treatment has no detectable negative impact on honeybee colonies and their pathogens
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-08523-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julia Osterman, Dimitry Wintermantel, Barbara Locke, Ove Jonsson, Emilia Semberg, Piero Onorati, Eva Forsgren, Peter Rosenkranz, Thorsten Rahbek-Pedersen, Riccardo Bommarco, Henrik G. Smith, Maj Rundlöf, Joachim R. de Miranda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 125 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 27 | 22% |
| Canada | 6 | 5% |
| United States | 6 | 5% |
| Germany | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 68 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 114 | 91% |
| Scientists | 8 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 114 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 18% |
| Researcher | 21 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 41 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 143. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2023.
All research outputs
#294,025
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#4,354
of 58,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,738
of 458,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#110
of 1,318 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,318 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.