↓ Skip to main content

Validating the extended character morality questionnaire

Overview of attention for article published in Media Psychology, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Validating the extended character morality questionnaire
Published in
Media Psychology, February 2019
DOI 10.1080/15213269.2019.1572523
Authors

Matthew Grizzard, Kaitlin Fitzgerald, C. Joseph Francemone, Changhyun Ahn, Jialing Huang, Jess Walton, Cass McAllister, Allison Eden

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Master 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 50%
Social Sciences 2 33%
Computer Science 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,314,178
of 13,486,731 outputs
Outputs from Media Psychology
#67
of 277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,210
of 295,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Media Psychology
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,486,731 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.