↓ Skip to main content

Short-Term Pain for Long-Term Gain: The Logic of Legislative Party Switching in the Contemporary American South

Overview of attention for article published in State Politics & Policy Quarterly, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Short-Term Pain for Long-Term Gain: The Logic of Legislative Party Switching in the Contemporary American South
Published in
State Politics & Policy Quarterly, February 2019
DOI 10.1177/1532440019826062
Authors

Antoine Yoshinaka, Seth C. McKee

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,310,315
of 13,370,991 outputs
Outputs from State Politics & Policy Quarterly
#109
of 200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,324
of 290,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from State Politics & Policy Quarterly
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,370,991 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.