↓ Skip to main content

The Information and Arena Model: Its Value and Limitations

Overview of attention for article published in Political Communication, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
The Information and Arena Model: Its Value and Limitations
Published in
Political Communication, February 2019
DOI 10.1080/10584609.2018.1548414
Authors

Peter Van Aelst, Stefaan Walgrave

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 67%
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 33%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 33%
Social Sciences 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2019.
All research outputs
#8,169,987
of 13,028,310 outputs
Outputs from Political Communication
#408
of 555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,530
of 275,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Political Communication
#12
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,028,310 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.