You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Analysis of SMALP co-extracted phospholipids shows distinct membrane environments for three classes of bacterial membrane protein
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-018-37962-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alvin C. K. Teo, Sarah C. Lee, Naomi L. Pollock, Zoe Stroud, Stephen Hall, Alpesh Thakker, Andrew R. Pitt, Timothy R. Dafforn, Corinne M. Spickett, David I. Roper |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 31% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 60% |
| Scientists | 14 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 162 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 26% |
| Researcher | 30 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 37 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 62 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 21 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 40 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,694,993
of 25,519,924 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#15,927
of 141,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,557
of 458,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#563
of 4,045 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,519,924 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141,508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,045 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.