↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of SMALP co-extracted phospholipids shows distinct membrane environments for three classes of bacterial membrane protein

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
39 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of SMALP co-extracted phospholipids shows distinct membrane environments for three classes of bacterial membrane protein
Published in
Scientific Reports, February 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-37962-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alvin C. K. Teo, Sarah C. Lee, Naomi L. Pollock, Zoe Stroud, Stephen Hall, Alpesh Thakker, Andrew R. Pitt, Timothy R. Dafforn, Corinne M. Spickett, David I. Roper

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 123 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 28%
Researcher 25 20%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 21 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 15%
Chemistry 16 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 23 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,032,132
of 18,800,073 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#10,287
of 100,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,773
of 358,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,800,073 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.