You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chronic Headache Education and Self-management Study (CHESS) – a mixed method feasibility study to inform the design of a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-019-0672-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kimberley White, Rachel Potter, Shilpa Patel, Vivien P. Nichols, Kirstie L. Haywood, Siew Wan Hee, Dipesh Mistry, Dawn Carnes, Stephanie J. C. Taylor, Martin Underwood, Manjit S. Matharu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 50% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 127 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 54 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 19% |
| Psychology | 7 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 55 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,844,879
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#443
of 2,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,121
of 445,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#25
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.