↓ Skip to main content

Costimulation of type-2 innate lymphoid cells by GITR promotes effector function and ameliorates type 2 diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Costimulation of type-2 innate lymphoid cells by GITR promotes effector function and ameliorates type 2 diabetes
Published in
Nature Communications, February 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-08449-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauriane Galle-Treger, Ishwarya Sankaranarayanan, Benjamin P. Hurrell, Emily Howard, Richard Lo, Hadi Maazi, Gavin Lewis, Homayon Banie, Alan L. Epstein, Peisheng Hu, Virender K. Rehan, Frank D. Gilliland, Hooman Allayee, Pejman Soroosh, Arlene H. Sharpe, Omid Akbari

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 6 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 29%
Student > Master 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 8 47%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,160,713
of 13,429,053 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#14,438
of 23,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,221
of 293,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,429,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them