↓ Skip to main content

Particle Diffusometry: An Optical Detection Method for Vibrio cholerae Presence in Environmental Water Samples

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Particle Diffusometry: An Optical Detection Method for Vibrio cholerae Presence in Environmental Water Samples
Published in
Scientific Reports, February 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-38056-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine N. Clayton, Taylor J. Moehling, Dong Hoon Lee, Steven T. Wereley, Jacqueline C. Linnes, Tamara L. Kinzer-Ursem

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 36%
Student > Bachelor 3 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Researcher 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 8 57%
Unspecified 3 21%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 7%
Chemical Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,387,766
of 13,376,849 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#11,602
of 64,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,967
of 291,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,376,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.