↓ Skip to main content

Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011828.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kim M Nielsen, Ann-Dorthe Zwisler, Rod S Taylor, Jesper H Svendsen, Jane Lindschou, Lindsey Anderson, Janus C Jakobsen, Selina K Berg

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 19%
Student > Master 11 13%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 18 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 18 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 18%
Psychology 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 30 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,176,542
of 14,322,412 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,704
of 10,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,376
of 327,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,322,412 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.