↓ Skip to main content

The foot posture index, ankle lunge test, Beighton scale and the lower limb assessment score in healthy children: a reliability study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The foot posture index, ankle lunge test, Beighton scale and the lower limb assessment score in healthy children: a reliability study
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1757-1146-5-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela M Evans, Keith Rome, Lauren Peet

Abstract

Outcome measures are important when evaluating treatments and physiological progress in paediatric populations. Reliable, relevant measures of foot posture are important for such assessments to be accurate over time. The aim of the study was to assess the intra- and inter-rater reliability of common outcome measures for paediatric foot conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 230 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 50 21%
Student > Master 35 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Other 15 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 55 24%
Unknown 44 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 21%
Sports and Recreations 19 8%
Engineering 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 48 21%