↓ Skip to main content

Working Time Society consensus statements: Evidence-based effects of shift work and non-standard working hours on workers, family and community

Overview of attention for article published in Industrial Health, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Working Time Society consensus statements: Evidence-based effects of shift work and non-standard working hours on workers, family and community
Published in
Industrial Health, January 2019
DOI 10.2486/indhealth.sw-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna ARLINGHAUS, Philip BOHLE, Irena ISKRA-GOLEC, Nicole JANSEN, JAY Sarah, Lucia ROTENBERG

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 255 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 14%
Student > Bachelor 32 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Researcher 15 6%
Student > Postgraduate 10 4%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 101 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 31 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 8%
Psychology 19 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 15 6%
Social Sciences 13 5%
Other 46 18%
Unknown 111 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,296,339
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Industrial Health
#119
of 770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,655
of 446,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Industrial Health
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.