↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of leaf-off and leaf-on combined UAV imagery and airborne LiDAR for assessment of a post-mining site terrain and vegetation structure: Prospects for monitoring hazards and restoration…

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Geography, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of leaf-off and leaf-on combined UAV imagery and airborne LiDAR for assessment of a post-mining site terrain and vegetation structure: Prospects for monitoring hazards and restoration success
Published in
Applied Geography, March 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.02.002
Authors

Vítězslav Moudrý, Kateřina Gdulová, Michal Fogl, Petr Klápště, Rudolf Urban, Jan Komárek, Lucie Moudrá, Martin Štroner, Vojtěch Barták, Milič Solský

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 33%
Unspecified 6 29%
Researcher 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 11 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 10%
Environmental Science 2 10%
Computer Science 2 10%
Other 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2019.
All research outputs
#8,113,512
of 12,936,999 outputs
Outputs from Applied Geography
#508
of 727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,816
of 271,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Geography
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,936,999 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.