↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of leaf-off and leaf-on combined UAV imagery and airborne LiDAR for assessment of a post-mining site terrain and vegetation structure: Prospects for monitoring hazards and restoration…

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Geography, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of leaf-off and leaf-on combined UAV imagery and airborne LiDAR for assessment of a post-mining site terrain and vegetation structure: Prospects for monitoring hazards and restoration success
Published in
Applied Geography, March 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.02.002
Authors

Vítězslav Moudrý, Kateřina Gdulová, Michal Fogl, Petr Klápště, Rudolf Urban, Jan Komárek, Lucie Moudrá, Martin Štroner, Vojtěch Barták, Milič Solský

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 139 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 18%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Lecturer 7 5%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 47 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 20 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 10%
Engineering 9 6%
Computer Science 7 5%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 58 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2019.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Applied Geography
#889
of 1,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,095
of 367,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Geography
#10
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.