↓ Skip to main content

Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
26 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007412.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cecily M Begley, Gillian ML Gyte, Declan Devane, William McGuire, Andrew Weeks, Linda M Biesty

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 272 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 60 22%
Student > Master 37 14%
Researcher 25 9%
Student > Postgraduate 17 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 46 17%
Unknown 72 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 22%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Psychology 6 2%
Other 19 7%
Unknown 85 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2021.
All research outputs
#919,188
of 17,421,713 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,429
of 11,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,111
of 350,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,421,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,684 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.