↓ Skip to main content

Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
28 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
625 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007412.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cecily M Begley, Gillian ML Gyte, Declan Devane, William McGuire, Andrew Weeks, Linda M Biesty

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 625 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 625 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 101 16%
Student > Master 53 8%
Researcher 46 7%
Student > Postgraduate 36 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 5%
Other 102 16%
Unknown 257 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 148 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 134 21%
Social Sciences 16 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 2%
Psychology 7 1%
Other 40 6%
Unknown 269 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,409,586
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,019
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,808
of 459,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.