You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploring undergraduate nursing student interactions with virtual patients to develop ‘non-technical skills’ through case study methodology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Simulation, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41077-019-0088-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Monica Peddle, Margaret Bearman, Lisa Mckenna, Debra Nestel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 43% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 37 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 35 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2019.
All research outputs
#6,311,196
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#181
of 235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,594
of 447,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.