You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of garlic on blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, June 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2261-8-13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karin Ried, Oliver R Frank, Nigel P Stocks, Peter Fakler, Thomas Sullivan |
| Abstract |
Non-pharmacological treatment options for hypertension have the potential to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease at a population level. Animal studies have suggested that garlic reduces blood pressure, but primary studies in humans and non-systematic reviews have reported mixed results. With interest in complementary medicine for hypertension increasing, it is timely to update a systematic review and meta-analysis from 1994 of studies investigating the effect of garlic preparations on blood pressure. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| Hungary | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Syrian Arab Republic | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 79% |
| Scientists | 3 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 332 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 117 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 11% |
| Researcher | 31 | 9% |
| Other | 25 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 6% |
| Other | 59 | 17% |
| Unknown | 58 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 108 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 23 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 52 | 15% |
| Unknown | 62 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2024.
All research outputs
#459,025
of 25,331,507 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#7
of 1,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#672
of 80,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,331,507 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,920 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.