↓ Skip to main content

Unexpected rip currents induced by a meteotsunami

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
13 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Unexpected rip currents induced by a meteotsunami
Published in
Scientific Reports, February 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-38716-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Álvaro Linares, Chin H. Wu, Adam J. Bechle, Eric J. Anderson, David A. R. Kristovich

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Other 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 39%
Environmental Science 2 9%
Engineering 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2021.
All research outputs
#438,013
of 17,673,294 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#5,052
of 95,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,523
of 352,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,673,294 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 95,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.