↓ Skip to main content

Unexpected rip currents induced by a meteotsunami

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Unexpected rip currents induced by a meteotsunami
Published in
Scientific Reports, February 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-38716-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Álvaro Linares, Chin H. Wu, Adam J. Bechle, Eric J. Anderson, David A. R. Kristovich

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Other 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 11 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 32%
Engineering 3 7%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 18 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2021.
All research outputs
#771,239
of 24,960,237 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#8,306
of 136,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,235
of 459,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#303
of 4,038 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,960,237 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,038 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.