↓ Skip to main content

Heart beat but not respiration is the main driving force of the systemic venous return in the Fontan circulation

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Heart beat but not respiration is the main driving force of the systemic venous return in the Fontan circulation
Published in
Scientific Reports, February 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-38848-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dominik Daniel Gabbert, Christopher Hart, Michael Jerosch-Herold, Philip Wegner, Mona Salehi Ravesh, Inga Voges, Ines Kristo, Abdullah A. L. Bulushi, Jens Scheewe, Arash Kheradvar, Hans-Heiner Kramer, Carsten Rickers

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Other 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 16 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 33%
Engineering 13 29%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Unknown 16 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2019.
All research outputs
#13,949,805
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#64,553
of 125,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,595
of 448,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2,278
of 4,030 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,030 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.