You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
La ética de los diseños y métodos alternativos de ensayos clínicos. Una reflexión sobre el Foro Global de Bioética en Investigación del 2017
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, January 2018
Carla Saenz, Florencia Luna, Sofía Salas, Julio Canario, Jackeline Bravo, Ricardo Palacios, Estela Quiroz, Patricia Saidón, Bertha Villela
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Postgraduate||2||13%|
|Student > Master||2||13%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||1||6%|
|Student > Bachelor||1||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||5||31%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||2||13%|
|Arts and Humanities||1||6%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||6%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
of 1,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 442,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.